During the bubble leading up to 2009, consumer confidence was high, even though many other indicators spelled trouble. Note this chart on money velocity:
You can see the velocity starting to slow in 2006-7. That was a bad indicator, but no one sounded the alarm, as the media are whores to the politicians & bankers, who use these wild swings in the economy to fleece the working man. They killed home ownership in one fell swoop, & took trillions from the people. Oh, sure, the banks lost some capital with the 'toxic loans', but the politicians bailed them out with OUR money!! But the people who lost equity lost it all. No one bailed them out. The govt not only failed in its basic duty to protect the citizens, they were complicit with the plunderers, robbing the citizens of trillions in savings & equity.
What about the 'toxic' loans? These were imperial edicts, by dubya & barney franks, the social engineers in charge of giving everyone a home. Indifferent to the consequences, they mandated banks to loan to anyone, oblivious to the bubble they were creating, & they shrugged off the millions of people thrown into bankruptcy. The poor people did not change. They shrugged it off & went back to govt housing. No losses to them. The banks were bailed out.. they got guarantees for the loans, even though it cost the taxpayers billions, & plunged us into a deep recession that we are still not out of.
The only losers were the working taxpayers. ..those who had some equity in their homes, or who 'invested' in other things with their equity. So a massive swing of real wealth began, taking from the working man, & 'redistributing' it to the bankers, the ruling elite, & their enablers: low information voters.
All we can expect is more of the same, as long as these same looters control the currency & fiscal policy. They will use it to fleece the working man, using Law as an instrument of plunder. I don't know how to give any financial advice in the current market.. the only thing that can fix this is revolution.. wholesale eviction of the looters in charge, with perhaps some guillotines tossed in for good measure. Then, there should be a concerted effort to provide a stable currency.. unemotional, unmoved by pity or charity. A currency should be amoral.. & be based on indifferent numbers & values. You cannot base a currency on compassion.. or at least, basing it on emotional appeals is a recipe for destruction, which is the least compassionate option.
You cannot manipulate money velocity, else the social engineers would do it. Limiting supply can limit velocity, but that is not the problem. We have plenty of supply, but no CREATIVE demand.. that is, demand created by production, which needs investment, labor, & intelligent innovation. The liberal 'demand' for money is superficial.. it wants the results of money.. tangible wealth, without the investment of capital & labor. They print money to buy stuff, but don't make or create any of the stuff. Stuff comes from overseas, or through govt theft. There is no velocity in this scheme, as the demand for goods is not based on growing wealth in the nation, but money shuffling from a fiat currency. Money is shuffled in artificially by fiat, but it leaches out of the nation, & has little movement within the nation.
Saying velocity CAUSES economic maladies is like saying your high temperature caused the flu. The economy is sick.. too much govt regulation, too much dependency, not enough production.. these are the CAUSAL factors. Velocity, job participation, housing, etc, are all symptoms of a sick economy, given to us by our sick representatives, with a sick world view that makes them think they can control these things by imperial decree.
Obama believes in the progressive/socialist fantasy that he can merely issue an edict, & the economy will respond. He has no clue about market factors, production, & the origin of wealth.